The recent 5-4 High-Court affirmation about maintaining all of Obamascare's nazi-like forced-health-purchase abortions-funding Individual Mandate under threat of annual $650+ IRS fine against each anti-Obominite-employee's Social-Security-related W-4 & W-2 declared income, then have his and her Medicare rationed away by an Obominite-czars Death Panel . . . is only the tip of the iceberg as to what the mafia-like triad of Obama/Reid/Pelosi and their socialist/fascist operatives seem to be secretly planning - though such info would never openly be admitted by them.
First of all, the same type of personal pressure and subtle extortion they have, for weeks previously, been putting upon chief judge Roberts of the High Court, they plan on imposing against election judges, ballot counters, secretaries of state, and even selected individual voters themselves pertaining to making sure that Barack Hussein Obama is re-elected in November of 2012. Their combined and persistent threats of intimidation, blackmail, and money-or-sex/reputation-or-job-security bribery payoffs go a long way for most people.
Only the few prudent and courageous do not fear the accusatory-charges millstone of alleged unconstitutional bigotry against racist-Constitution-Amendment black reparations plus feminist-sexist-19th-Amendment "Creator-endowed women's equality-and-liberation amongst all men" heresy hung around their political and economic-survival necks.
The accursed have already been quite successful in puffing and promoting waffling-windsniffer Willard Mitt Romney [rather than solidly-pro-life/anti-homosodomite Newt Gingrich] as the "presumptive GOP presidential candidate" for the upcoming 2012 GOP National Convention in Tampa. As the reader should be well aware of by now - by thoroughly having investigated the non-photoshopped brief YouTube-based movie exposees at Videoclips 12 and similar Google-informed sources - that cultic-quasi-mormon Mitt Romney is the Father of individual-mandate Romneycare [lauded by TFK and Bill Clinton] after which Obamascare was patterned, and non-discriminating-against-homogays, homoperverts-inclusive Mitt Romney adamently and ardently has proven himself supportive of a woman so-called "right" to choose to commit abortion-homicide murder against non-born womb babies even before he ran for Senator and Governor in Massachusetts against the doctrines of the sometimes-Spirited Mormon Tabernacle Choir.
By doing so, aforementioned demoncrats, propagandized by their media hitmen such as bonehead-reviler Ed Schultz, twitface Rachel Maddow plus despicable-blasphemers Mike Malloy and Bill Maher . . . in falsely-opposite concert with counterpart republicrat agents, examples of which are talk-radio Boortz and Medved, Jason Lewis plus even apostate-NIV-theology Hugh-Hewitt, anti-sharia playboy-minded mopheaded-womanizer Hannity, arrogant O'Reilly, wandering-blatterer Dennis Miller, and a host of others not to mention) . . . have "taken the activist wind out of the sails" away from would-have-been fervent ultra-orthodox pro-Republican campaigners.
Forced Individual-Mandate Obamascare (i.e. the NON-affordable but so-called "Affordable Patient Care Act") is intrinsically based on mistrust against God the Lifegiver, and for ambitiously-self-aggrandizing wicked purposes.
It is not a manifestation of a trusting attitude that the lovingly-accommodating Lord will keep us healthy, but rather a suspicious and superstitious gamble that Christ will instead sadistically let us get sick - whether we ourselves would be to blame, or because of others at fault.
Similar it is to greed-for-financial-power gaming at a casino, involving the probability of losing at the tables and slots more money than is gained.
It is assumed, in that scenario, that not only financial-health-deteriorating gamblers at the tables and slots have to prepay mandated insurance to compensate for their likely losses, but also those who do not attend the casino also are forced to prepay an IRS-penalty tax both because: (1) they themselves might begin to healthlessly gamble into temporary poverty by themselves eventually losing to disease more than they gain in health, and (2) they are involuntarily required to help cover the disease-like losses more than financially-healthful gains of those monetarily-depleted sickos and crippled gamblers already trashing themselves into the disease-like tank of economic impoverishment because of them irresponsibly and carelessly imbibing in odds-against-them tables and slots (like giving addicted-to-gambling dogs what is holy and throwing pearls before mindlessly-wasting-paycheck-income swine).
But, what Obama, Reid, and Pelosi probably have in mind goes much further in terms of oppressive and godless satanically-socialist tyranny.
To wit, how about government-ordered-and-Obamascare-reimbursed psychological testing and psychiatric "treatment" "for" (i.e. against) purportedly-"terroristic" or sociologically-"dangerous" anti-Obominite dissidents, robofone calls to everyone questioning them reminding them to purchased government-approved healthcare, as likely next steps, along with not merely refusal to treat emergency patients in hospitals but even subsequent arrest and felony jailtime unless such patients have proof of previously not simply attempting to acquire but actually obtaining Obamascare individual-mandated insurance?
It matters not to Obama, Pelosi, Reid and their heartlessly-ruthless ilk that the Lord Jesus is involved in bestowing and maintaining God-given-and-Divinely-maintained good health for Law-abiding persons. It clearly matters not to them whether or not a person owns or drives a car as to forcing them to buy auto insurance - being that pedestrians are always in danger of getting hit by a vehicle when "irresponsibly trespassing" as a "reckless public nuisance" onto government-owned city streets and highways.
And health insurance is not the only thing that Obama and Reid and Pelosi likely intend to mandate forced purchase for.
All three of those non-defeatable-by-ACORN/Panther-tampered-election persons suspiciously seem to have their sights on similarly taxing American citizens pertaining to what they prospectively and then presumptuously claim as government-owned-and-taxable sunlight, gravity, ocean tides, earthquakes, atmosphere, and Van Allen radiation-belt assets.
Figuring that all of the above natural resources could be altered or polluted against EPA Standards by either human interference or mismanagement, or even Acts of God adversely affecting citizen health, individual-mandate insurance purchase concerning such disaster-relief-reminiscent Marshal-Law-regulated coup looms in the very-near future.
Plainly, steps culminating in such an "unthinkable" desperate scenario need not be taken so gradually from now on, since the High Court has given Precedent for further, much-more inclusive and far-reaching, repressive and restrictive actions conveyed and enforced by disregard-traditional-law Executive, secret-session Legislative, and strong-armed judicial Mandates enacted and sustained by Obama, Reid, Pelosi, his Senate democrats, and that horde of genuine-Christians-and-true-Christianity-hating patsy network media and campaigning-activist subversives previously mentioned.
One obviously-viable way out of all this, but one viciously despised and vehemently pooh-poohed by not merely MSNBC and especially CNN talking heads but particularly pseudo-"conservative"- RINO movers and shakers on TV and talk radio . . . can be discovered by open-mindedly exploring the total contents of website BWP (an appropriate name considering how Sean Hannity and other self-described religious types disdain the honorably-decent-and modest full-length and slippered islamic attire of non-mopheaded/non-sleevesless/non-slacksless/non-soxless burka and hijab costume outerwear worn outdoors publicly during warm-weather days).
As to High-Court-discussed pros and cons concerning (and not "regarding") the recently-and-wrongly-adjudicated "constitutionality" of the non-constitutional "Affordable Care Act" (commonly referred to as Obamacare, or Obamacare), it should be noted that United States citizens from coast to coast are not dependent upon Obama nor his Obomination to supply and continue United States citizens with amount and quality of free gravity, sunlight, and even breathable air and drinkable water. Nor are they the providers of good health.
Even if they, in some minute ways, attempted to regulate - with a few concocted devices - and infinitesmally mis-adjust gravity, sunlight, air, and water - and then, on top of that, impose taxation and fines or penalties using that excuse - their phenomenally puny and practically insignificant manipulations would not significantly affect nor deter the entire planet's population from continuously being provided with life-sustaining natural resources for survival having been bestowed by their Almighty Creator.
It is possible, but would similarly be non-constitutional (as some minority-opinion judges on the High-Court judges pointed out) enslave and constrict Americans, with some kind of Individual Mandate, to commercially buy cellphones for more prompt police and fire assistance, or have to buy commercially-purchased burial or cremation insurance.
What makes ObamaScare anti-constitutional, and completely different than widespread Social Security paycheck deductions for those having Social Security affiliation with the United States Government (in view of a general positive consensus of the vital usefulness of such, particularly for seniors unable to get entrepreneurial employment when in hospice), is that the Government (and not any private, or group of private, commercial companies or corporations), receives, processes, and disburses Social Security benefits to those who have paid into it.
Therefore, a repeal and complete abrogation of Obamascare, replaced by Scripturally-adjustabable and fraud-free cradle-to-grave Social Security and Medicare provision, administered in totality by the Government and not any private, or group of private, commercial companies or corporations, is the appropriate substitute.
The monies needed for such would first and initially be supplied, and adequate, by the amount saved by obliterating $500 billion Obamascare, refusing service to illegal aliens, and withdrawing foreign aid from countries who vote against America in the United Nations, green-energy pork projects, and with militaristic misdirected fervor blasting bullets and mortar rockets into the barren and non-inhabited sands of Afghanistan.
It is a non-constitutional integration of church and state, mosque and state, and synagogue of state . . . and a clear violation against both the anti-Establishment and the Non-Prohibition Clauses of the First Amendment of the Constitution . . . to designate Obamascare to anti-Biblically fund anti-pregnancy contraceptives for fornicators and adulterers and sodomites; pay for abortion homicides; subsidize abusive and needless mammograms and side-effects-causing pharmaceuticals for drug dependents who can and should instead get their anti-toxin nutrients simply from a balanced combination of trustful faith in God, moral obedience to his Divinely-declared "Operating-Manual" directives, healthy foods and drinks, adequate rest and sleep, plus sufficient exercise.
Health insurers make a profit by going on the assumption, and (in a legitimate sense) gambling, that the premiums they get from voluntarily-contracted customers will exceed expenditures to those customers when such customers occasionally get mildly to more-severely sick or injured.
But to force gaming-by-chance-similar health insurance companies to insure everyone with so-called "pre-existing [poverty] conditions," plus forbidding coverage limitation caps, is like strong-arming managers who profit from legalized gambling casinos to dole out jackpots to every pre-existing-poverty person who enters and pulls slot-machine handles.
Those especially those who deliberately cause themselves (through their own illegal carelessness and irresponsibility) to have "pre-existing conditions" . . . and thus to blame for handicapping themselves . . . must NOT be given a free handout by sane and sensible, law-abiding, health-conscious citizens would absurdly waste their precious and hard-earned incomes mandatorily deposited into some universally-required insurance-payments pool for antisocially hostile or mischievous ne'er-do-well riffraff, and thus not "throw their pearls before swine" nor "give dogs what is holy."
The New-Testament book of Acts tells about a sort of Christian "socialism" where everyone shared everything they had and no one called anything they owned their own. But that plainly was a voluntary option, and once it was "bought into" the understood requirement was thereafter across-the-board sharing.
In that case, St Peter put it right when he stated to Ananias: "While the profits of the sale of your property was with you, did it not remain your own? But once you joined our Holy-Covenant-Share-All, and supposed to declare all that you got from that property sale saying that it was the total amount of that property sale, when it was not the total amount, why did you perjure yourself and lie about the amount withheld?"
Not everyone under Obamascare would be under obligation nor forced to commercially purchase their own commercially-available health insurance (and if not becoming penalized by the IRS), being that Indians and illegal aliens and prisoners plus those very poor whose registered (in contrast to non-declared) W-4 income is under $3700 annually, OR receiving nothing but up-to-$10,000-annually birthday or other gifts, OR having their self-employment Form 1099 state that they earned less than $400 annually . . . do not even have to file Form 1040 nor Form 1040A nor Form 1040EZ, along with those not living with their spouses anytime during the year.
Even IF the IRS rules changed regarding those exemptions-of-sorts, so that everyone had to declare ALL monies annually acquired (including birthday gifts in non-serial-numbered coins or bartered goods or services), the extremely poor would, of necessity, be thrust into declaring complete bankruptcy because of having to "pay their fair share" (whatever that means or doesn't mean) into the Obamascare insurance-coverage pool.
Moreover, the touted claims of purported current(?) "benefits" of Obamascare, when it comes right down to it, are piffle and relatively insignificant...even counterproductive often times.
"Free checkups and exams for 'preventative' 'care'?" (or is it instead I.D.-disclosing and/or invasive abuse)?
"Free pharmaceutical drugs" to further debilitate addicted seniors to eventual and cumulatively-fatal side effects, without them simply relying on God-given natural remedies, good foods and drinks, trust in God, and both sufficient rest and exercise?
WHO needs such? WHO actually uses such?
"Free mammograms" (which abusive procedures males thankfully cannot have, but which generally-needless "nurse"-inflicted torture actually causes more harm to women enduring and suffering through such than they are worth)?
"Insurance coverage for [mature-adult 'children' up to age 26" (who are irresponsibly dependent upon their financially-oppressed-and-overburdened parents)? Not needed for childless couples!
Why "up to age 26?" Why not up to age 37? Or 44? Or even 58?
Forcing health-conscious and law-abiding citizens to contribute to a general-health-insurance pool for fornicating unwed mothers living on the dole, sterilizing themselves to various intensities and degrees with NON-"birth"-"control" anti-pregnancy contraceptives ultimately leading to species extinction along with promotion of same-gender-sodomy perversities, plus allowing NON-"reproductive"-"health" murder against non-born human babes plus irreparably mangling the bodies of their mothers who commit and not "perform" abortion homicide.
Not everyone needs Obamascare coverage in case of a rare heart or liver or kidney transplant, or some other extraordinarily-expensive operation. Not everyone becomes a crippled quadriplegic, with all the massive financial drain that involves.
"Free colonoscopies" (which many times are fatal for older seniors, many of whom simply do not risk having them)?
No more Social Security checks for them!
Perhaps the reader will - by now - understand why this webpage author relegates mere-economics-professor and non-commander-in-chief-type Ron Paul to the sidelines. The multi-vaginal-viewings/pussies-perusing baby-delivery doctor is quite savvy about financial relationships, but is laissez-faire when it comes to national law enforcement and quite isolationist concerning lack of foreign-aid funding for Israel (in contrast to Newt's present and previous family apparently interested in being of assistance to the descendants of Jacob).
Many secular people, some even supposedly-religious heretics and/or those apostates who presume they know about the genuine Christian religion based upon canonical Scripture, have both strange and wrong ideas about what constitutes an authentic Biblical Christian evangelical, and thus bonafide Christian evangelicals as a whole.
In other words, many in the network media simply "don't have a clue" what a real orthodox-Christian evangelical is, what they believe, and what they want in a political candidate.
It should be obvious, by the very definition of the word, that "evangelicals" are those who "evangelize" - which term, for Christians, has to do with proclaiming and publicizing not merely "the gospel" but also the laws and doctrines such is contextually related to regarding Holy Writ.
For example, I heard one broadcaster state that "christian" "evangelicals" are divided as to whether or not there should be love of the sinner but not the sin; whether or not one should hate the sin but love the sinner; whether there should be reconciliation and tolerance toward those alleged to be "born" homogay (i.e. effeminate) and under congenital biological compulsion to engage in same-gender sodomy unions; whether there should be forgiveness and acceptance of immodestly-misdressed fornicators who accidently went too far and decided to regrettably choose the option of committing abortion homicide to end an inconvenient, costly, and embarrassing pregnancy.
Another broadcaster said that the sexual social issues are not as important to "christian" "evanglicals" as beating Obama in the November 2012 Election, and/or creating jobs for the unemployed, reducing inflation, going green to stop global warming, maintaining welfare and entitlements, plus withdrawing from expensive and needless wars fought overseas which needless intrusions into particularly islamic sovereignties both anger the adversaries and endanger our national security.
Mitt Romney is a slick and handsome non-trustworthy expert at mouthing carefully-omitted words of audience-pleasing diversion and inclusiveness without giving controversial and flagrantly-polarizing specifics on the details of sensitive sexual social issues like abortion and homosexuality. He is, in that sense, deceitfully tricky in attempting to be all things to all people especially pertaining to sexually-oriented topics.
To wit, when citing his so-called support from "right-to-life" groups in Massachusetts as an alleged proof of his "pro-life" stance (after years of copious You-Tube-documented televised-campaign pro-abortion-choice interviews), he fails to reveal that his words-only rhetoric he has uttered and even his signing some legislation apparently concordant with "pro-life" intentions belies the fact that he probably knew that his whitewash show would be overturned by a higher authority in his state (thus pacifying the abortionists) and then federally . . . and which he, as a political-opportunist flipflopping windsniffer, would not appeal to a higher court to actually achieve an overriding anti-abortion outcome.
Romney (and even homogays-tolerant Rick Santorum, for that matter) has been more open and vocal in his speech to not discriminate against homoperverts, even though he - illogically - says that he does not support homogay sexual unions or "marriages" -- although, again, he has done nothing and will do nothing to pursue in appeal to higher authorities what it takes to disallow such abhorrant and obnoxious sodomy pacts.
Newt Gingrich was no draft dodger, because although he registered with Selective Service, he legitimately got a student deferment as many honorable patriots did who decided to serve the military needs of their country in intelligent and scholastic ways other than deliberately playing bullets-and-explosives russian roulette under bullyboy inept and insensitive field commanders who considered troops under them mindless expendible robots.
RINO-endorsed Romney is another Bob-Dole and John-McCain retread, and it is sincerely hoped that Republican Party hierarchy has learned the lesson that compromising moderates simply don't win elections for them, and in the futile attempt to woo the immoral majority with piss-with-pop/poop-with-pudding moderates into one big tent, they deplorably fall far short of exciting anyone to fervent activism and becoming enthusiastic for the type of lukewarm mediocrity that Scripture says results in being spit out of the mouth in disgust.
Romney was not the only one to be involved in a business. Newt had his excusions in commercial ventures as well - minus the questionable Mitt-type overseas-bank-account tax-avoidance shenanigans.
And Gingrich has the advantage of not simply governing a state, but in dealing successfully with higher-powered U.S. senators and U.S. representatives in both houses of Congress -- a far more difficult task than simply state governorship. Indeed, Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, at least on par with Romney as far as gubernatorial know-how is concerned, decided that the delicate and substantially-successful congressional balancing endeavors of Gingrich was much more of a asset and credential for presidential qualification, in or out of Washington.
Newt's past sexual history and marital events might seem sort of kinky and even dirty to gutter-minded anti-sexuality/anti-erotica legalistic hypocrites who would have liked to or even themselves secretly did what Newt is assumed to have done (without the .jpg pics and .mpg videoclips to prove it).
Moreover, Gingrich has a proven record of actually being against porn, actually being against homogay unions leading to species extinction, and actually being against abortion homicide also leading to species extinction . . .whereas who-knows-what-Mitt's-history-of-porn/fornication/adultery-is Romney (who is yet deceptively and ultimately "choice" by subtly-devious default) has in essence done more dastardly criminal sin to indirectly conspire to murder pre-born babes by supporting planned-promiscuity/planned-parentlessness "choice" than Newt ever did according to all the defamation-intended sexsationally-blattered gossip of rumored concubinage-like heterosexual experiences.
Romney diverting attention off himself by criticizing and condemning Barack Hussein Soetoro for Obama's/Pelosi's/Dodd's/Reid's/Biden's/Hoyer's socialistic individual-mandate tyranny and economic incompetence is no excuse to thus support Mitt, and even Romney himself (if you listen to who of the GOP candidates he does not mention by name but which political party he claims to attach himself to and wants to make darn sure they do all they can to prevent Obama's re-election) admits that any of the other GOP presidential candidates than himself would be preferable to Obama . . . as delusions-of-grandeur legalistic-and-judgmental accusator Santorum rants on and nitpicks about and against everyone other than himself.
The RNC of the GOP (and bear with me when I say this) should never have allowed Newt Gingrich to run as a 2012 GOP presidential candidate - if their intention was to throw some kind of a catch-them-also teaser bone to ultra-fundamentalist Christians as Republicrats also welcome the 'big-tent'/big-toilet stench of poop-in-pudding/piss-in-pop homoqueer Log Cabin Proud "republicans."
Not that I despise Gingrich, like various left-wing/whatever-wing subversive scumbags and even damnable pseudo-"republican" fools I have seen on the TV and internet screen.
In fact, Newt would be the one GOP presidential candidate I would definitely vote for in November of 2012.
But, when a majority of especially so-called "conservative" media gurus on Fox and on subsidiaries of Salem Communications puff pro-choice-Massachusetts-senator/governor waffling-windsniffer Willard Romney as the ultimate GOP presidential candidate for 2012, I come proverbially close to vomiting.
Mitt Romney reminds me of King Saul in the Old-Testament record. Handsome. Tall. Suave. A comical and energetic suburbanite-like yuppie. A rich guy. Talented accusatory talker.
But someone who, like Saul, based his faux morality on the likes of Ted Kennedy and his ilk in Massachusetts.
I did not know (and perhaps I am being sarcastic) that the Deity-of-Jesus-denying cultic-but-moralistic Mormon church supported committing (and not "performing" - as the MCCL puts it) abortion-homicide choice. I do suspect (and probably rightly so) that Romney was [supposedly] a "Mormon" before he ran for the political office of Senate and the Governorship in Massachusetts.
That being the case, it is most perplexing to me how someone with such intimate and close ties to that Mormon church before getting into political office of any kind could adamantly and vociferously state that he "supports a woman's right to choose" and fully intended to "keep abortion safe and legal in Massachusetts."
Now, I can understand someone who presumes that the Earth is flat instead of globular, until they are enlightened with NASA photos from a space station circling high above the Earth. I can understand someone who does not know how to distinguish the symbolic/figurative/metaphorical and potentially-ridiculous misrepresentative semantics related to the Bible concerning (and not "regarding") the lunacy that "a day to the Lord is a thousand years" . . . and thus concoct and absurdly profess belief in millions and billions of years for the [so-called] "days" of Creation Week.
But something so basic as the knowledge and assurance that obviously humankind did not evolve from apes; that it is wrong to force or suggest that men or women sexually commit murder; that it is wrong to rob banks and steal from the poor; that it is wrong to be irresponsibly and careless pollutive to the well-aware-of-it harm against others . . . and that the not-yet-born conceived human inside a pregnant mother is clearly a living human baby with a living spirit and an immoral soul . . . should be PLAINLY obvious to anyone who claims affiliation with moralistic religion.
I have heard people say: "If you don't vote for Mitt, you are voting for Obama."
Who SAYS I would be voting for Obama, when I definitely am NOT going to vote for Obama?
I have heard people say: "If you don't vote for Mitt, and instead vote for the 2012 Constitution Party presidential candidate, you'll be throwing away your vote."
To which I would answer: "Did you not hear my words? How many times do I have to repeat into your hard-of-hearing ears that I am NOT voting for Obama?
Obama, Kenyan-birthed illegal-aliens-excuser and mother-of-all pro-arab jobs-losing economy-wrecker, having done essentially nothing about getting the nation into all-electric cars or becoming energy-independent, supporter of homogay perverts and sexist feminists engrained into the High Court, is NOT going to get my vote. Compromising Romney isn't either, but again - since you seem to be dull of mind - I will say it again: I am NOT going to vote for Obama in the 2012 Election. GET it, now?"
Sure, Romney won't get my vote either, but neither will Obama. Thought I would utter that once more to both pound it and bash it into the stupid prejudicial minds of accursedly-biased morons, imbeciles, and idiots.
And it is not that I am trying to please OR displease both or either Romney OR Obama NOR their supporters. I simply like the reference to "Jesus Christ" in the Preamble of the current Constitution Party platform . . . so I will appear to both Romneyites and Obamanites as either a traitor against both or a neutral factor drifted away into oblivion and irrelevance.
So be it.
I would remind you, the reader, and everyone else, that I am NOT neutral on the subject of committing (and not "performing") the pseudo-"health" pseudo-"medical" crime AND sin of abortion homicide.
And I would vote for genuinely-anti-abortion-homicide Newt Gingrich as THE 2012 GOP presidential candidate, if that ever came about during the upcoming 2012 GOP Convention in Tampa.
It is hoped that rowdy Ron Paul advocates and activists will help cause Romney to lose his 1144 soft-delegates "clinching" of the nomination, and constructively cause an open brokered Convention to occur - giving Newt a good chance to become the moderate and umpire (bolstered by Rick Santorum and Rick Perry) between the warring factions of strong-arm-extortionist Romneyites and fervently-passionate Paulites.