As indicated previously, and especially during the 11 Sept 2008 evening presidential-candidate interview, Obama exposed his plan for his tyrannous brand of socialism against America with him as the overseeing dictator.
In the pseudo-sacred name of "volunteerism," Obama apparently intends to establish a system of offering government incentives and financial assistance under the condition that those who receive it will do what he and his administration designate and apportion as certain types of hard work he calls "community service." We remember the fenced and confined concentration camps with the Arbeit Macht Frei (Work Makes Free) of a previous regime in Europe during the 1940s. Obama's brand might of course generally not utilize physical fences and confinement for those admirers who cooperate and comply.
These incentives and benefits would not merely be bonus checks from the government for a little extra money, but instead be income related to the very life-support of the participants. In other words, welfare payments, school-loan-assistance grants, housing and vehicle-purchase loans from the government, food stamp and medical care and rent assistance, and perhaps eventually even Social Security checks, would only be given out to recipients who do whatever Obama and his administration decide they should do, designated as "voluntary" community service "for the country," both internally and internationally in foreign lands.
His intent seems to have the result of mobilizing for constructive opportunities those young people who are simply laying around doing nothing, getting into trouble, trying to overcome boredom by getting into destructive gangs, narcotics acquisition and use, video games, graffiti vandalism, lootings and assaults, etc.
Clearly, such indolent and trouble-causing young people will not voluntarily join up with Obama's government brigades unless there is monetary benefit or law-enforced compulsion behind it, and even more importantly, a personal allegiance to Obama, Obama's vision and intentions for his version of The American Dream and The American Way, and a mutually-agreed-upon enemy and adversary to hate and fight against. Such was the pattern antichrist-like Adolf Hitler took in pre-war Nazi Germany in his ascent from young Nazi Party member to Fuehrer of the Reichstag with the stated enemy being the jews and the goal being the reconstruction of Germany's industry and economy. Atheistic-communist Lenin followed a similar course in aligning the Russian people against the previous czar and his associates living in affluence at the expense of the common people. In both cases, a false and satanic theocracy was imposed against genuine saints of the Lord.
Why Obama's socialism would be tyrannous as previously mentioned is due to Obama's actual lack of genuine Christian and Biblical worldview. What religious-heretic Obama has declared about Christianity is lamentable misapplications and distortions [against and not of] Scripture, such as using verses of New-Testament-quoted love, forgiveness, and non-judgmentalness to tolerate and accept everything from abortion homicide to homogay perversion. Thus, Obama's bureaucratic administration, including Obama himself, would be legalistic, narrow-minded, demanding in polite but required sorts of law-enforced and statute-enforced ways, and non-imaginative as to accomodating and giving free-rein space and privacy and no-strings-attached funding relating to the unique aspirations and talents of those true Jews who think outside the box, have special gifts of certain abilities, and should not be confined to the one-size-fits-all educational or vocational objectives of godless bureaucrats and administrators who do not have the creative and Jesus-as-God-glorifying, total-Bible-promoting, mind of Christ.
The words: "Palestine" and "palestinian(s)" are artificial terms found NOWHERE within the Sacred-66-books Old-and-New-Testaments HOLY BIBLE.
God's Law, specified in both Testaments of Scripture, clearly designated and continue to designate Israeli territory (specifically defined within Scripture) to Jews - not so-called "palestinians."
Thus, the Holy Land is NOT [purported] "ancestral homeland" of properly-punished-and/or-excluded antisemitic arabs (particularly blasphemously-heretic cultic-muslim/moslem ones).....but rather to those the Jesus-as-Messiah geneological ones the LORD apportioned and apportions in His Word who have faith in Christ along with works congruent with that faith.
The trouble-causing descendants of Ishmael have been and should continue to be ousted as God directed Abram and Sarai.
Heretically, quite lamentable is the erroneous inclusion of the one-and-only use of the word "Palestine" in the KJV and KJ21 instead of the correct word "Philistia" in the ASV, JPS, RKJV, RSV, etc. Joel 3:4 - which is another example of despicable human faultiness, lying deception, infidel apostasy and/or accursed ignorance here and there not merely in the KJV but also occurring here and there in every English mistranslation/translation of the actual and real Sacred-66-books HOLY BIBLE.
As much as the KJV is accurate regarding the words "younger women" in their rendition of I Timothy 5:14 instead of the wrong words "younger widows" (lamentably found in most every other English Translation except the WTNT and Wesley NT), grievous and diabolical semantical errors are plentious within the KJV, as for example the uncalled-for euphemism of "abusers of themselves with mankind" (whatever THAT means or implies!) instead of the correct word "sodomites" (Gr. arsenokoitai) in I Corinthians 6:9, misuse of the word "Easter" instead of passover in Acts 12:4, miswording of "Would that God my lord" in II Kings 5:3 instead of "Would that my lord," and so forth.
NO English "bible" translation to my knowledge has I Timothy 5:11 translated correctly according to the exact and precise inerrant Scrivener-Trinitarian Greek New-Testament Text. As you can logically concur that all younger widows are younger women, but not all younger women are younger widows, so the Greek word for "younger women" [ne(o)teras] and the word for "widows" [ch(e)ras] are obviously two distinct, separate, and dissimilarly-spelled Greek words. Thus, I Timothy 5:11 SHOULD read: "But refuse younger-women widows..." instead of "But refuse younger widows...." Of course, substantiation that the word [ne(o)teras] does mean: "younger women" and ONLY means "younger women" is found in use of that singular and specific Greek word in I Timothy 5:2 and 5:14 and correctly rendered ONLY as "younger women" in most English Bible translations.
There is even a problem with corrupt Greek Texts purporting to be authentic New-Testament Texts. The Sinaiticus and Vaticanus contain obvious gross errors, as does the Westcott-and-Hort and Nestle Greek texts related to the errant Metzger-Aland United Bible Society text. Apparently the true and correct trinitarian Greek Text of First John 5:7 from Erasmus is based on Latin manuscripts being that additional Greek manuscripts for such have not yet been discovered or are not readily available publicly.
The interlinear Greek-English New-Testament text edited by Gene Ricker Berry includes a concocted Greek-text addition to the last verse of the last chapter of the New-Testament book of Romans in which Berry states that Phoebe is the author of Romans. NO other English translation IN EXISTENCE has THAT erroneous inclusion!
QUESTION NUMBER ONE: Is it acceptable for a military chaplain of the United States armed forces to end public prayers in the name of the deity Jesus Christ, and/or rather pseudo-deity "allah?"
QUESTION NUMBER TWO: Should the phrase performing abortion or instead the phrase committing abortion be used by the media when abortion is done?
QUESTION NUMBER THREE: A follow-up to the previous question. The exact same New-Testament Greek-Text word brephos is used both for the pre-born babe John in Luke 1:41 AND for the already-born babe Jesus in Luke 2:16. Does that clearly prove the personhood of the preborn human babe with soul in the womb of a human mother?
QUESTION NUMBER FOUR: The New-Testament Greek-Text words malakoi and arsenokoitai are exclusively translated into the English words "effeminate" and "sodomites" respectively pertaining to those the Scripture verses of First Corinthians 6:9-10 state will not inherit the kingdom of God. Without any additional qualifications at this point, will homogay effeminate and homopervert sodomites indeed not inherit the kingdom of God?
QUESTION NUMBER FIVE: The opening verses of Leviticus chapter 27, two verses of Ecclesiastes 7:27-28, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13, First Corinthians 14:33-38, First Timothy 2:12-14, and First Peter 3:7 obviously infer that the weaker-sex gender are worth less than the superior gender and should not teach nor serve as combat soldiers in authority over men. Does that clearly prohibit a woman from becoming Commander-in-Chief President of the United States?