It is understandable that Jesus Christ had to be the progenitive product of not merely an inferior-gender specimen of humankind, but also the offspring of the equivalent of Divine insemination - being that He had such a "colorful" family-tree ancestry of fornicators, adulterers, and in one case, incestuous:
Genesis 19:30 Now Lot went up out of Zoar, and lived in the hills with his two daughters, for he was afraid to reside in Zoar; so he lived in a cave with his two daughters [better than a unisex outdoor biffy].
19:31 And the first-born said to the younger, "Our father is old, and there is not a man on Earth to come in to us after the manner of all the Earth.
19:32 Come, let us make our father drink wine, and we will lie with him, that we may preserve offspring through our father."
19:33 So they made their father drink wine that night; and the first-born went in, and lay with her father; he did not know when she lay down or when she arose. [but he got enough of a kick out of it to become reproductively erect, although it is a wonder he did not recognize his own daughter. Maybe she wore a disguise, and said nothing to avoid voice recognition]
19:34 And on the next day, the first-born said to the younger, "Hey, I lay last night with my father; let us make him drink wine tonight also; then you go in and lie with him, that we may preserve offspring through our father."
19:35 So they made their father drink wine that night also; and the younger arose, and lay with him; and he did not know when she lay down or when she arose [but he liked it enough for another reproductive penile erection, although - again - exhibiting the same strange lack-of-identity cognition].
19:36 Thus both the daughters of Lot were with child [not simply "abortable surgical tissue"] by their father.
19:37 The first-born bore a son, and called his name Moab; he is the father of the Moabites to this day.
By the way, this instance of incest occurred before the Mosaic Torah Law was given, but how are incestuous Lot and his incestuous daughters described?
Second Peter 2:4 For if God did not spare the angels when they sinned, but threw them into Hell and committed them to pits of nether gloom to be kept until The Judgment;
2:7 and if he rescued righteous ["RIGHTEOUS?"] Lot, greatly distressed by the licentiousness of the wicked
2:9 then the Lord knows how to rescue the godly from trial, and to keep the non-righteous under punishment until The Day of Judgment,
2:10 and especially those who indulge in the lust of defiling passion and despise authority.
Ruth 4:10 "Also Ruth the Moabitess, the widow of Mahlon, I have bought to be my wife, to perpetuate the name of the dead in his inheritance, that the name of the dead may not be cut off from among his brethren and from the gate of his native place; you are witnesses this day."
Ruth 4:12 ...and may your house be like the house of Perez, whom Tamar bore to Judah [more info about that later on in this piece], because of the children that the LORD will give you by this young woman."
Ruth 4:13 So Boaz took Ruth and she became his wife; and he went in to ["into?"] her, and the LORD gave her conception, and she bore a son.
Matthew 1:5 and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse,
Matthew 1:6 and Jesse the father of David the king. And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah,
Matthew 1:16 and Jacob the father of Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom Jesus was born, who is called Christ.
Genesis 38:1 It happened at that time that Judah went down from his brothers, and turned in to a certain Adullamite, whose name was Hirah.
2 There Judah saw the daughter of a certain Canaanite whose name was Shua; he married her and went in to
[into"?] her,
3 and she conceived and bore a son, and he called his name Er.
4 Again she conceived and bore a son, and she called his name Onan.
5 Yet again she bore a son, and she called his name Shelah. She was in Chezib when she bore him.
6 And Judah took a wife for Er his first-born [Judah the Matchmaker!], and her name was Tamar.
7 But Er, Judah's first-born, was wicked in the sight of the LORD; and the LORD slew him.
8 Then Judah said to Onan, "Go in to your brother's wife, and perform the duty of a brother-in-law to her, and raise up offspring for your brother."
9 But Onan knew that the offspring would not be his; so when he went in to his brother's wife he spilled the semen on the ground [might never have even gotten close to her vagina], lest he should give offspring to his brother [strange inheritance scheme].
10 And what he did was displeasing in the sight of the LORD [as are condoms, and coitus interruptus], and He slew him also.
11 Then Judah said to Tamar his daughter-in-law, "Remain a widow in your father's house, till Shelah my son grows up" (for he feared that he would die, like his brothers). So Tamar went and lived in her father's house.
12 In course of time the wife of Judah, Shua's daughter, died; and when Judah was comforted, he went up to Timnah to his sheepshearers, he and his friend Hirah the Adullamite.
13 And when Tamar was told, "Your father-in-law is going up to Timnah to shear his sheep,"
14 she put off her widow's garments, and put on a veil, wrapping herself up, and sat at the entrance to Enaim, which is on the road to Timnah; for she saw that Shelah was grown up, and she had not been given to him in marriage.
15 When Judah saw her, he thought her to be a harlot, for she had covered her face.
16 He went over to her at the road side, and said, "Come, let me come in to you," for he did not know that she was his daughter-in-law. She said, "What will you give me, that you may come in to me?"
17 He [without recognizing the familiar voice of his own daughter-in-law, or pretending that it was a mimic?] answered, "I will send you a livestock specimen from the flock." And she said, "Will you give me a pledge, till you send it?"
18 He said, "What pledge shall I give you?" She replied, "Your signet and your cord, and your staff that is in your hand." So he gave them to her, and went in to her [or was it instead "into" her?], and she conceived by him.
19 Then she arose and went away, and taking off her veil she put on the garments of her widowhood.
20 When Judah sent the some livestock specimen by his friend the Adullamite, to receive the pledge from the woman's hand, he could not find her.
21 And he asked the men of the place, "Where is the harlot who was at Enaim by the wayside?" And they said, "No harlot has been here."
22 So he returned to Judah, and said, "I have not found her; and also the men of the place said, 'No harlot has been here.'"
23 And Judah replied, "Let her keep the things as her own, lest we be laughed at; you see, I sent this livestock specimen, and you could not find her."
24 About three months later Judah was told, "Tamar your daughter-in-law [relating to your deceased wife, making you a single-marital-status widower] has played the harlot; and moreover she is with child [not simply "fetus"] by harlotry." And Judah said, "Bring her out, and let her be burned." [and the non-born womb babe inside her also? "Holy Abortion-Homicide! as Batman's Robin would exclaim.]
25 As she was being brought out, she sent word to her father-in-law, "By the man to whom these belong, I am with child." And she said, "Acknowledge, I implore you, whose these are, the signet and the cord and the staff."
26 Then Judah acknowledged them and said, "She is more righteous [ MORE "righteous?"] than I, inasmuch as I did not give her to my son Shelah [nothing like a red-blooded deprived Jewish woman]." And he did not lie with her again. [Great. Only a "one-night stand."]
27 When the time of her delivery came, there were twins in her womb.
28 And when she was in labor, one put out a hand; and the midwife took and bound on his hand a scarlet thread, saying, "This one came out first."
29 But as he drew back his hand, hey, his brother came out; and she said, "What a breach you have made for yourself!" Therefore his name was called Perez.
Matthew 1:1 The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
2 Abraham was the father of Isaac, and Isaac the father of Jacob, and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers,
3 and Judah the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, and Perez the father of Hezron, and Hezron the father of Ram,
4 and Ram the father of Amminadab, and Amminadab the father of Nahshon, and Nahshon the father of Salmon,
5 and Salmon the father of Boaz by Rahab, and Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth, and Obed the father of Jesse,
6 and Jesse the father of David the king. And David was the father of Solomon by the wife of Uriah...
So, the Lord had some "skeletons in His closet," so to speak - for which He was not responsible nor to blame.
But, the previous Scripture references do show the overwhelming drive and craving of people to have sex - with or without being married to each other, in various cases of dire need and desire.
On YouTube, possible it was (and might yet be) to call up short "social experiment" "prank" videos of Gals Asking Guys To Have Sex, and yours truly would imagine that a guy asking random gals to "have sex" with him would get him no females willing to take him up on that, but if a pretty gal in mopheaded and scant summer attire asked guys at large, at least half the guys might agree. And the query is more acceptable to many than asking guys: "Would you like to genitalize me?"
Such is intriguing, being that guys are not as endangered as are gals to "have sex" with strangers (although both are targets for venereal diseases and blackmail by surveillance). Also, it is not as much as a problem for guys to have multiple heterosexual partners in terms of legal relationships, which is not the case with gals who probably already belong to someone (whether a father or brother or husband or boyfriend).
But regarding morality, and both religious awareness and definitions of "fornication" and "adultery" (not "bigamy" - which is a noxiously anti-polygamous "legal" definition in some feminist-sexist places on the planet), gals would be far better off asking ONE particular guy at random:
First Corinthians 7:1 Now concerning the matters about which you wrote. It is well for a man not to touch a woman.
2 But because of the temptation to immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband.
3 The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband.
4 For the wife does not rule over her own body, but the husband does; likewise the husband does not rule over his own body, but the wife does.
5 Do not refuse one another except perhaps by agreement for a season, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, lest Satan tempt you through lack of self-control.
8 To the unmarried and the widows I say that it is well for them to remain single as I do.
9 But if they cannot exercise self-control, they should marry. For it is better to marry than to be aflame with passion.
And:
First Timothy 2:15 Yet woman will be saved by bearing children, if she continues in faith and love and holiness, with propriety.
And:
First Timothy 5:14 So I would have younger women marry, bear children, manage their households, and give the enemy no cause to revile us.
The questions a sensible and cautious guy would ask in response to the anonymous female's request to become "his permanent concubine" might be:
"What's a concubine?" "Why me?" "Do you belong to anyone else right now?" "What would your husband or boyfriend say?" "We don't presently know each other that well, do we?" "It sure beats the feces out of searching for and lusting at porn on the Web or renting pricey public-gutter masseuse or escort harlots for lewd and indecent conduct." "Is this a joke, or prank?" "Do you really mean what you have asked?"
If her responses were logical and sensible to all his questions (e.g. "A concubine is spouse to her husband, and sort of a non-licensed wife." "I chose you because you look like a worthy and capable partner I could take as my singular husband." "Right now I have no husband nor boyfriend." "Even though we do not know each other that much right now, if you like who you see, I am available and willing." "And finally, no, this is no a joke nor a prank, and I really meant what I asked you.")...
...he could follow up with:
"I am already married, but I could take you as an additional (though not "different" nor "new" nor "replacement") spouse." "When do you want to be my concubine? Now, or instead, later on?" "And how would we privately and perhaps publicly certify between ourselves that we had gotten into and are maintaining a kind of common-law permanent husband-concubine sexual relationship?"
If she then replied with: "As I said before, you really do look like a worthy and capable partner I could call you my singular husband as your concubine . . . but of course our further qualifications (or lack of them) would have to be known to each other before we would take or not take each other in marriage."
His next interrogatives might then be:
"Well, both of us could get on the internet and print out three forms, one of which is a Preliminary Analysis Form, and then a Marital Qualifications Determination Form, and finally a Concubine Certification Form. After both of us fill those out, and giving copies to each other, if we then decide that we both are right for each other, we then would actually become husband and concubine together on the date the MateCerts were mutually signed by us. Quite a surprise that might be for our close relatives and friends, and identifying ourselves to the government as a "married" couple would be dicey and have to be done discreetly to avoid legal complications and entanglements."
"But being that Obamanites have neutered DOMA at the federal and high-court level, and a significant number of States have [supposedly]-"officialized" so-called "marriage" of homoqueer males and females now [so-called]-"legally" licensed for lustful-and-not-loving pervert-sodomy unions, Scripturally-based Old-Testament patriarchal-polygamy non-bishop/non-deacon common-law concubinage should be no problem for them - with or without the wearing of 4th-finger purity rings. Maybe you are ready for a hyphenated last name, or new middle name. Not only that, but we should keep in mind the marriage-was-surprisingly-mentioned prediction of Jesus:"
Luke 17:27 [paraphrased] They ate, they drank, they breathed, they urinated, they defecated, they fornicated and adulterized, they self-sodomizingly masturbated, they bathed, they repeatedly did it all over and over and over again, they married, they were given in marriage, until the day when Noah entered the ark, and The Flood came and destroyed them all.
Jill responds:
"Sounds like a plan." "By the way, what's your first name?"
"Call me Jack." "What's your name?"
"Call me Jill."
"OK!" "By the way, Jill, if we had filled out those forms and mutually agreed that we were acceptable to each other as spouses, where - for starters - would you be willing to have sex with me as my permanent Christian concubine?"
"I have at least two inexpensive sex spots in mind. One is inside my local library, within which are two single-person lockable lavatory rooms without any "Men"-or-"Women"-type gender designations. The other is inside some lockable outdoor biffy in some remote location. A lockable "family room" in some shopping mall is also a possibility, or in the back of some car or van without windows or transparent windows view in some isolated parking place. Beats the dung out of impoverishing ourselves utilizing some overly-spendy motel room in our current homeless condition without hospitalization-for-pregnancy health insurance."
"Good suggestions."