Computerarium

Anti-Ukraine-extortionist, unwilling-females-assaulter, corrupt-son-Hunter-protecting, eucharist-denied-for-being-abortion-choice, quasi-senile Joe Biden is into forced acceptance of reverse-pronoun and rest rooms transgenderism.

Lone Ranger (music)

High-School Graduation-Test Final Exam

CRULES (Control Rules)

No Choice: Dangers of "Original Sin" Theology

Why Believe the Bible?



FEAR of God

Body Show

Who is God?

Original Sin Nature?


Cateresy: Atonement by Ingesting Eucharist?


NO "Purgatory"

NO woman should orate in a pulpit nor at a lecturn
near the altar in any Christian church, Islamic mosque, or Jewish synagogue
within a congregation containing men, per First Corinthians 14:33-38 and First Timothy 2:11-14.

Hitler's Speech (English captions)

Hitler's Speech (French captions)

Other Hitler Speeches

Love Hate

Also, NO child 12 and under (noisy or not) should be allowed entrance into any religious-worship sanctuary
per Job 6:24 & 13:5, Psalm 62:1, Proverbs 22:15, Ecclesiastes 3:7, Isaiah 3:12 & 47:5, Habakkuk 2:20,
Zephaniah 1:7 and Zechariah 2:13


Which to Wear: hijab, niqab, chador, or burka?

Free Will & Blood Sacrifice?

Three Heresies Refuted

Law to Save?

Dress to Caress

Pre-Destiny?

Trust God?

Comparison of Various Bible-Verse Wording in Different Bible Translations

Credibility of Common Sense Science

Roy Moore and the Election of December 2017

Law to Yet Obey, or Faith Only not Fruits-of-the-Spirit Good Works for Salvation?

Pa - NOT Ma!

Slut Hair

Decent Hairstyes

Martin Luther and the Jews

The Big Three:

Mate Prep
Mate Exam
Mate Cert

DECENT & DESIRABLE
Women Wear Long Hair
Tied in a Single Back-of-Head
Ponytail
or Tied in an
Up-Do

(rather than rebelliously, pornographically, and demonically
letting it hang loose below mouth-level).


It IS a BIG Deal . . .
. . . the difference between getting and keeping
an affectionate and trusting husband faithful, or not . . .
and the difference between eventually going to Heaven, or instead
going to Hell!


Comparison of Various Bible-Verse Wording in Different Bible Translations

All-Season Public-Modesty Dress Code

High School Graduation Final Exam

Excluding Govt-Imposed Pro-Homo/Pro-Abort Pagan-Religion Non-Discrimination Statutes
for Churches, Synagogues, & Mosques




God FOR Wine!

Convention Speech to Catholics

Counteracting "catholic" Heresies

Polygamy!

Print, re-copy, distribute, and utilize this as an Annual Mate-a-Thon Application and Questionnaire!

Summerwear!

Bare Arms in General-Public View?

Need More

Not for All

Slap Back (Turn The Other Cheek?)

Clean Air and Climate Change

Hotlink to Some Old-Tyme, Junior-Hymnal-Numbered, Evangelical-Lutheran/Baptist, Hymn Titles for Simple Guitar Strumming in the Keys of G and D only



Jack Koziol, president and founder of InfoSec Institute, an Illinois-based information security training company, inferred that Twitter account manipulations
primarily are done through phishing scams.

Former Obama press secretary Robert Gibbs is the global chief communications officer at McDonald’s, fueling internet speculation that the restaurant’s anti-Trump tweet was not a hack attack.

“Prior to that he held several senior advisory roles in the White House, serving as [Barack Obama’s] press secretary during his first term, then as senior campaign advisor during his re-election campaign,” McDonald’s announced in 2015.
“…In his new role, Gibbs will lead McDonald’s corporate relations group, which manages internal and external communications and government and public affairs.”

“He will lead McDonald’s in communicating clear, coordinated messages to internal and external constituencies, enhancing the brand and supporting corporate strategies.”

As press secretary, Gibbs was a known liar who admittedly, under orders, mislead the public about the Obama administration’s drone program.

In any case, thank God for alternatives like Burger King, Arby's, KFC, Wendy's, and Hardee's.


Polygamy?!

Isaiah 5:20 and Isaiah 10:1combined paraphrase =

Woe to those accursed and impatient human vile vermin infesting the United States who believe and say that "American Values" are non-judgmentally tolerating and even crusading for the inclusive diversity of allowing homosexual perverts to state that such have a "right" to mis-call their "legalized" homosodomy unions "marriages,"
that so-called "transsexual" and "transgender" homoperverts have a "right" to enter whatever gender-specific public restroom they want which is not the same as their actual birth gender,
that women have a "right" to commit abortion-homicide infanticide against mere "fetus" or "fetal tissue" of "their own bodies" and claim that that is "reproductive" "health,"
that so-called "palestinian" anti-Zionists have a right to antisemitically disdain and misconsider Jewish settlements "illegal" in the God-given-and-Biblical-designated territorial land which God specifically designated for blood descendants of Abraham and Isaac and Israel,
who call evolution (anti-Genesis heretical mythology): "science,"
who call immodest and indecent-exposure pornography: "art,"
and who claimed and yet claim that an (inferior-gender) woman should have and should become President.


Old-and-New-Testament English Bible Translations Comparison

Prayer-Deaf?

The "Begotten" Son of God Always Was

Saved by Law

WHO DO YOU WANT TO BE ELECTED PRESIDENT IN 2020?



STOP the Freedom from Religion Foundation!

Do the surrounding background sounds of babbling or loudly-chattering children
or women speaking or singing feminist distractions bother you when you want to concentrate on what you want to focus at when on the internet?


An old-WWII warfare technique called "jamming"
(using library-provided headphones attached to computers)
to effectively override (block out) harassive childish and feminist noise are selections hotlinked at webpage:


http://snapupright1.tripod.com/choralsounds.htm

Detailed Biblical Basis for Public Modesty Pertaining to
Female-Human Hairstyles, Armwear, Legwear, and Footwear


The Christian Common-Law Concubines Connexxxion

It is rather deceptive for certain canned drinks and fruits to be labeled: "No Sugar Added" when instead the large-lettered front label should read: "Splenda Added."

Splenda (sucralose)
was downgraded from "safe" to "caution" in 2013 after an Italian animal study linked sucralose to a higher risk of developing leukemia.

Avoid purchasing drinks with weird-tasting Sucralose with the strange after-taste and instead drink sweet beverages with sufficient plain sugar. Read the fine-print ingredients-content labels required by the FDA. Limit intake of such sweet drinks as to not cause potential or overt diabetes and obesity problems, and dilutive spring water can be ingested to compensate.

Black Holes are not actually holes of emptiness, but instead compactions of star matter so condensed that gravitational attraction of such is so intense that electromagnetic radiation such as photons of light are trapped and cannot escape, and none can be seen through such so-called black "holes" to observers on Earth.

As fast-spinning electrons in orbits around nuclei, which change orbital proximity to those nuclei in response to incoming or outgoing forms of electromagnetic energy, absorb or emit other types of electromagnetic energy such as visible light, so changes of particles within nuclei themselves result in the production and alteration of gravity-wave radiation.

There is no such thing as "space-time." Space involves only three dimensions of length, width, and depth....whereas time merely involves duration. Of course, both space and time can and do describe positionings and interactions of actual physical objects and interrelated forces.

Light from objects apparently millions or billions of light-years distant from Earth and observers on Earth did not travel the duration of millions or billions of years to reach Earth, but instead light related to such actual and however-distant stellar objects was created enroute along with those however-distant stellar objects during Creation Week described in the first chapter of Genesis in the Holy Bible.

All items in creation were created by the Creator in already-fully-functioning and ongoing form which obviously did not slowly assemble, with an alleged "mind of their own," in non-functioning-by-themselves/ non-interdependent-with-other-parts pieces or segments.

(Christian CyberTract Mission)



http://www.biblegateway.com/versions/ Jubilee-Bible-2000-JUB

Bible-Translation Test Verses

The following two Bible verses are useful for testing whether or not a considered "Bible" translation is - in fact - a bonafide, legitimate, fairly-faithful, and at-least mostly-accurate translation of the Sacred-66-books Judeo-Christian Old-and-New-Testaments Holy Bible:

First Timothy 5:14



First John 5:7



Greek/Latin-Text Manuscript Basis for KJV's First John 5:7

Pre-Sex-Exchange-Massage Analysis, Selection, and Acceptance Forms

BibQuiz
DateExam
MateCert

The publicly mopheaded and/or sleeveslessly-nude-armed and/or slackslessly-naked-legged and/or soxless - majority OR minority - wicked mis-using their freedom to impose non-solicited, public-nuisance harassment of spam-like immodesty of themselves in the presence of modesty-minded righteous . . . interferes with the decently-attired righteous using their freedom to see only modestly-dressed people in their presence.

Bring on the black, brown, or tan hairbands!

It's a question of who has the police on their side, and a further question of which police have God and His Holy-Bible dresscode on their side.


Gov Rick Perry for Heterosexual Marriage

Anti-Distractions Om Drone

If the State issues Marriage Licenses to same-gender (NOT same-"sex") couples to pseudo-"legitimatize" their intended
homosodomy lust, the words: 'husband,' 'wife,' 'fornication,' 'adultery,' and 'sodomy' become meaningless to the State,
and they will ultimately even be unable to effectually differentiate between 'male' and 'female' humans for
public rest-room lavatory purposes . . . plus incapable of distinguishing between 'his' and 'hers,'
between 'he' and 'she,' between 'him' and 'her,' and between 'boy' and 'girl.'

Such will be quite inconveniently and even dangerously problematic for at least lawyers, judges,
and social workers involved with family law.


Anti-Effeminate-Gay Anti-Homo-Sodomite Rainbows

SudoXians

WHAT is the best way to fight back against injust wrongdoers? Whether personally in a neighborhood or city setting, in politics and government, and whatever else?

Should their property be vandalized? His or her money be embezzled or stolen? His or her reputation or credibility defamed? They themselves injured or murdered?

The very words: "vandalized, embezzled, stolen, defamed," "injured," and "murdered" obviously imply non-authorized acts.

Seemingly-identical applied fulfillment of the words above might appear similar, but are instead to be described with fitting semantic definitions of what instead is legitimate, understandable, and justified as a necessary and expedient means to a righteous end.

We must first understand that vengeance belongs to God - whether the Lord does it directly through some coincidental-happenstance Act of God . . . or whether He decides, in some way, to call and mandate one of his human agents to apply forceful justice of whatever type on His behalf.

IF HE chooses to commission one of his chosen and non-hypocritically-qualified human agents to sensibly inflict selective havoc on a particular adversary, the Spirit of Jesus Christ (and concordant with His sacred-66-books Old-and-New-Testaments Holy Bible) determines who specifically (and only who) the punishment is to be applied to, what exactly the particular retribution will be, the severity, and duration, plus appropriate time and place for such to occur.

Even though angry emotion might be involved on the part of God's human executioner of whatever sort, that executioner must - in all rational and controlled sanity and caution - realize at all times that he is effecting justice on the Lord's behalf, and not merely his own.

Anti-Effeminate-Gay Anti-Homo-Sodomite Rainbows

Anti-Homo-Gay Anti-Homo-Sodomite Rainbows

No matter how proficient, knowledgeable, and/or
talented a woman is, she is NOT qualified to
publicly teach nor be in authority over men.


[ Refer to Leviticus 27:1-5, Numbers chapter 30,
Ecclesiastes 7:25-29, Isaiah 3:12, Nahum 3:13,
First Corinthians 11:1-16 and 14:33-38 (KJ21),
First Timothy 2:8-15 and First Peter 3:7 ]


When reading Scripture or listening to the Bible being read,
take literally whatever can obviously and sensibly be taken literally.
Also, try to discern under what conditions and circumstances
Biblical passages can be taken literally, whether directly or indirectly.
If encountering what seems to be figurative or symbolic,
read or listen further for logical interpretations
or explanations which should be understood,
accepted, and applied literally.
If the symbolism presently cannot directly be associated
with literal reality, patiently wait for future explanations,
or actively search for and be open-minded
to discovering appropriate and applicable
literal interpretations and explanations.


Decent [Public] Hairstyles

The Christian Church of St Nathaniel

There are ADVANTAGES for Herr Ratzinger (a.k.a. Pope Benedict) to resign as Pope:

(1) Health and Safety Concerns

(2) He does not have to continue to be harassed by sexist females and their irritating feminist voices, imposing themselves as Scripture or liturgy readers during masses

(3) He does not have to continue to be besieged by demands from homoperverts for same-gender union blessings and/or employment in the church

(4) He does not have to officially represent the Vatican by need to encounter the Kenyan-not-Hawaiian-born, "I-have-done-no-evil/he-has-done-no-evil," pro-abortion-choice Barack Hussein Obama as questionably related to the United States

(5) He can pursue his piano performances and practices

(6) He can concentrate on composing and publishing Douay-version-assisted theological dissertations instead of being bogged down with tediously-repetitive mass mantras plus slow-moving and boring up-front choreography, along with tacit espousal of the heresies of self-sacrificial atonement by eucharistic ingestion, relics worship, pilfering indulgences as purported payment out of never-never-land "purgatory," non-canonical Apocrypha, idolatrous maryolatry, etc.

(7) He is free to take the following three verses of Scripture literally and seriously:

Leviticus 21:14
A widow, or one divorced, or a woman who has been defiled, or a harlot, these [the high priest] shall not marry; but he shall take to wife a virgin of his own people.

First Corinthians 9:5
Do we not have the right to be accompanied by a wife, as the other apostles and the brothers of the Lord and Cephas?

First Timothy 3:2
Now a bishop must be above reproach, the husband of one wife, temperate, sensible, dignified, hospitable, an apt teacher.

Some fine young German or Italian Catholic virgin awaits him.

My current guess is that the Marriage Amendment on the 2012 Minnesota Ballot reads: 'Marriage will consist of the union of one man and one woman' - with no specifically-stated nor inferred nor insinuated prohibition against homosexual [pseudo]-"marriage" contained therein.

An added clause of something like: " . . . and same-gender marriages shall not be allowed but instead prohibited as criminal misbehavior punishable by prompt execution without appeal. would, of course, be something homogays and homosodomites would be aroused and agitated by.

But such is nowhere in the present clause - and again, it is not even faintly suggested, inferred, insinuated or whatever else.

The MN Marriage Amendment wording is so vague that it is not only benign but almost worthless.
Marriage shall be the union [is THAT a business, military, or ecclesiastical union?] . . . of one man with one woman
[Once, twice, a few times? Temporary or permanently? For what purpose(s)? Sometimes or always with the same or different partners?]

It would have been MUCH preferable if the proposed Marriage Amendment phraseology had instead read that Marriage shall be the union of husband and wife.

The present and exact MN Marriage Amendment wording on the ballots SPECIFICALLY states that marriage shall be the union of one man with one woman. It does NOT read that Common-Law-Concubinal Cohabitation shall ONLY be the temporary or permanent sexual OR business union of one man with ONLY ONE compatible-enough woman or women.

IF the latter was the wording, IRS Form 1040 would have to be adjusted so that the 'Married" option would have to instead read: "PRIMARY Wife."

Voting NO on the lamentably-misworded [anti-harem-polygamy] Marriage Amendment ballot question essentially and simply disallows even marriage of one man to one woman.

Hello extinction against humankind!

In other words, voting NO on the ballot amendment proposal (or leaving it blank as a default NO) is saying that marriage must NOT be the union of man and woman, and in effect illegalized, without the freedom to so marry nor continue to be married in a one-man-with-one-women union.

That, obviously, is exactly, and the very opposite result-in-fact of the hideously-despicable orange lawn signs reading: "Vote NO. Don't Limit the Freedom to Marry."

Limiting (in fact, DISALLOWING) the freedom of a man to marry a woman is EXACTLY what the lawn signs hypocritically claim to not limit.

Second Thessalonians 2:9 The coming of the lawless one by the activity of Satan will be with all power and with pretended signs and wonders,
10 and with all wicked deception for those who are to perish, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved.
11 Therefore God sends upon them a strong delusion, to make them believe what is false,
12 so that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in non-righteousness.
13 But we are bound to give thanks to God always for you, brethren beloved by the Lord, because God chose you from the beginning to be saved, through sanctification by the Spirit and belief in the truth.
14 To this he called you through our gospel, so that you may obtain the glory of our Lord Jesus Christ.
15 So then, brethren, stand firm and hold to the traditions which you were taught by us, either by word of mouth or by letter.
16 Now may our Lord Jesus Christ himself, and God our Father, who loved us and gave us eternal comfort and good hope through grace,
17 comfort your hearts and establish them in every good work and word.

Yours truly cannot fully express in mere semantics the intense and fervent admiration and appreciation for the most-admirable very-modest decent exposure of burka/hijab-attired muslim women, plus patriarchal/non-matriarchal social structure of islamic-fundamentalist men . . . diametrically-against, understandably-contrary and righteously-opposed to diabolical and noxious, sexually-harassing, general-public-view mopheaded and/or sleeveslessly-naked-armed, slackslessly-nude-legged, soxlessly barefooted in noisily-flipflopping sandals annually-and-incessantly characteristic of many hellbent-for-imposing-porn-incitement "american" females . . . along with their despicable and deplorable, dangerously-irrational, confusion-causing, and irritating feminist sexism.

The other evening when I saw and heard homosexual-advocate foreign-Brit Piers Morgan on CNN tell Ahmadinejad of Iran that Morgan believes homosexuals are born homosexual, Ahmadinejad responded with a "Why do want to impose something so ugly on other countries?"

Reminded me of the Bible verse:

Ezekiel 16:27 Hey, therefore, I stretched out my hand against you, and diminished your allotted portion, and delivered you to the greed of your enemies, the daughters of the Philistines, who were ashamed of your lewd behavior.

God views the inwardly wickedly-faithless and lustfully-promiscuous heart of a whore-lookalike when she outwardly flaunts loose long hair, exposes sleevesless naked arms and/or slacksless nude legs and/or soxless feet in attention-getting floppy sandals.

The Fetmem Group

Subporn?

CDCCMN WebTract-Essayette Hotlinks

Undo Them
How to Judge
THEY Hate!
"Jesus" as "God" in Governments?
Who's Boss?
NO "allah"
Why Trust God?
Who To Be For
NO Carly Fiorina!
Set To Be Bad?
The Constitution is Lacking
Liar Liar
Rong Wird
Endtime
Earth Age
Creationist Originos
Bible Verses To YOU
Law Hate
CashBind
2015 GOP-FOX Debate
Sin Blame?
Big Sign
Who To Vote For?
Queries
Trust It
No Law?
Theofany?
Say What?
Homoweds
PropGrab
Works Save
Tax Who
Gay for God
Sensazia
Guns for Who?
Trade Pact
Grafucka
Falt Who?
Summerwear
Summerclothes
Clobbered?
How Do You Know?
Girl King?
Channel 7
Male Revs Only
Headshot
Why 666?
Kill-A-Fag
Promises
Real Wine
Do It Right
Die for God?
"Like" God
Don't Come To Christ Non-Prepared
Napocode
Lois Lerner et al
Prove It !
BibHistory
The Drain
Apology
Only Words
Un-Title Obama
BareTalk
GoodCrop
Heretic
Holy Kiss?
Mate Selection Manager
BibQuiz
DateExam
MateCert
Uncurse?
Feed Pigs?
Resurretti
Counter-Feminist Interview with Wolf
First Fruit
Nice Try
What Saves?
Spam Nuts
Friction
Resolved
TimeMyth
Cathnip
Save Govt
Specula
Imminency?
Horn Warn
Exodus: Gods and Kings
NIV or KJV New Testament?
NAS or KJV New Testament?
To Think
Oblgated
Mphdized
Laud to Who?
Third Coming of Christ?
Who for What?
Love the Law
Glory Marriage in Heaven
Commerceros
Worth What?
Comceros
Highview
Newest Hotlinks
Pro-Homogay/Homosodomite Lavender Public Spam
Pro-Homogay/Homosodomite Lavender Advertisers
Ecumenical Chaplain's Prayer
Verdict
When To Do It
Alternate Hymn Lyrics
The Discreditor
God Certification
Lalapage Login
Facebook/g-mail.com/bluetie.com E-mail Censors
What is "Spam?"
Hate or Love?
Sex Spots Solicitation
"The Way"
Tumblr Sex?
Sex in Heaven?
Isaiah 7:14 . . . "Virgin" or "Maiden?"
Chapters & Verses of the Bible?
Kill Them
Legitimate Public Sex Ed
Remorse
NOT "Why"
Godverse
Isaiah 7:14 . . . "Virgin" or "Maiden?"
Chapters & Verses of The Bible?
Kill Them
Legitimate Public Sex Ed
Remorse
NOT "Why"
Godverse
ALL Good?
RapCrap
Addictos
Foreseen
Word Use
Homosodomy Activism Timeline
In, or Out?
Bad To Rise
Slut Hair
How To Die
Affront
Hospice
Life's End
Freedom
Unbuffed
Portal
Duh_
Taste God
Pairadox
THE Rapture
Sinful Body?
Preknowledge?
Privasee
Divorce-Proof Your Marriage
Polygamy and Revelation
"Watever"
Physicist Lise Meitner
Dress for Sex
A Rebuilt Temple?
How To React To People Without Going Crazy
Bare Arms in General Public View?
Not Enough
Yes To Sex!
Fear WHO?
Spamdits
Die Later
Trash
Hitcher
XXXtra Lass
GovMates
Into and Thru The Tribulation
Slavery
Galsport (hairstyle pix)
Godz Love
Secrecy?
Group of 4 (textfile)
Pre-Trib Fib
Fault Who?
Obama Illegalities
Sex in Heaven?
Webwives?
Land Mines
Rod To Rule
Paebaak
Tax Breaks for Rev Homes (#1)?
Tax Breaks for Rev Homes (#2)?
No Escape by Rapture
Soros/Obama NPV To Bypass Electoral College?
Predestined?
MonyMozy
No Sex for Them
Lukewarm
"God" Will Do It?
How To Become a Christian
BHO vs USA Sovereignty
IRS Regulations for IRS-Registered Churches/Synagogues/Mosques, and The CCC
Government for "God?"
Why Reject Barack Hussein Obama?
The Christian Concubine Connexxxion
Child Sex
How To Do It
Concubies
Sacrifice?
"As Oft As?"
No "Confession?"
Oust Them!
Pathos/Pinterest?
Tyrannits
Theolity
"What if . . .?"
Critique
Anti-Conception Slavery
Angels
NSA Probes
No More TV
GodSpeak
God's "Sins"?
Polygams
Obama for Abortion Choice
Beginning, Birds, and Begging
Hussein/Mubarak
Neoliturgy 2
LCA Red-Hymnal Score (with Lyrics)
Default?
BamAhead
Remember?
Dress Code - "Everywhere?"
Helbownd
'Nuf Said
WHO is "God"
Can't Do It . . . Anymore
Global Warming?
NO Forcing!
BamaStart
Depends . . .
"Right" to Choose?
Eucharistic Euphemism
Defalt1
Defalt2
Defalt3

The Prophecy Order
Pastview
Her For Him
Nude For God?
Sex For God
Jacob
ProfPlan
Immersion or Sprinkling?
Saveways
Mod Law
Who To Hate
Hijabods
Class Test
XXX-Tra Requirements
Won't Play
NO Mercy
No Permit
Tempting
Zimmerman Trial
Biblical Vengeance and Retribution
Turn Him On?
Mispeech
Real Women Fry Eggs
"Kenyana"
Immigration & Welfare?
No-God Genesis?
Antichrist
For Shame?
Omit Them!
NOT Equal!
Light Be!
NO to Homos!
Catolica
You Choose
Esteemed
Primorda
Mercy?
Forever1
HetWrest
Lavabit?
Atheistic Nasties
Intruder - A Prophetic View
Holy-Week High-Court Homo-Wed Hearings
Go Easy on Them?
God Gender
NO Threesomes!
Jews Land
Terms for Work
SexText
Force Not!
Truth
Coexist?
Law of God
Tech Talk
Gay to Stay (?)
No Terrorist!
By "Faith?"
No Doubt
Meet For Sex
The Weird
Tax-Free!
Only One Way
Who First?
No Drink at Passover?
Get To Work?
Why Care?
Hopeless?
Godwimps?
Women OUT!
3rd-Prez-Debate Analysis
Abortalk
Past History, Endtime Prophecy
2nd-Prez-Candidates-Debate Analysis
WHAT is "Marriage?"
Zionists
Sunday Church Dress
GOP 2012 Election Foes
Theocrazies?
DemCon2012
Dems2012
Do To Undo
Misster Chickinn
BamaGate
Candidate/Spousal S.A.D.
Staeaway?
God's Falt?
Must See?
Ronglove
No Regs
Let 'em Grow
One Up, One Down
Chooseys
Compared
To Get [Much] Worse
Last Time
Twitnits
Voter I.D.?
Kidsexxx?
Apalagy
Enigmas
Superbama?
Divorce?
Dumbo Devil
Only Part
The Seder
"Oopsies?"
Group Talk . . . and Censorship
Obamascare, and the High Court
Advisors (to Obama, Gingrich)
Terrified
Vidclips (Obama, or Gingrich?)
Told Off
Atheism
Trini-WHO?
Hate for Love?
What To Say?
TopGov
Tax The Poor?
Get It Right
For God Rule (#2)?
For God Rule (#1)?
Cut To Die?
Newtygamy
God Poll
Why Pray?
Aramaic?
Try Again
Tempters
Do It Once
Sum for Sex
Hospice
Doctrinal Defects
Motty Pouths
Opinions Poem
Accursed
Excluded
Men Abuse
NO Facebook
Serious Pun Fun
Pun Fun
Sxlution
THE Boss
Fake Cult?
Corp Need
Evil Good?
To Pardon
We Must Do It
Whynosea?
Love Wimps?
Jobs To Tax?
His To Say
Jobs, Jobs
ThPuleas [Facebook]
Good Hate, Bad Hate
Metaphors?
Suicide?
A Few Good Men
Funding & Apportioning Social-Security Benefits
President Ron Paul?
Chief BHO
Fight to Win
No Excuse
Tax Them
Pass the GOP House CCB Bill!
Since When?
As It Says.
Say NO! to Michele Bachmann
Nude for Who?
"Battered?"
Greet Us!
Endtime Prophecy
Deviates
Sodomarriage
God Government
CheckMate
Rulers
FedCare
No Limit
No Choice
Repenter
Rejectem
REAL Obama Birth Certificate!
Gay Bann
BamaPuff
BamaPast
Do Them Both
B.O. is B.S.
Pseudoclergy
Slandits
Trumped
Jewsgate
Soetoro
Literics
2012 Prez?
FDIC Fuzz?
Labor Day
Exposee
Government Shutdown?
Trust Who?
Customer Attire Analysis Report
Sexbait
Taxation
Judging?
Rebirth
Haus Kalz
JUST For Some
IT Does It?
ONE Time
It Will Be
Ponytale
Insulted?
Not MY Say
God for Government
TrikTalk
Partnership Reconnaissance Form
Partnership Acquisition Form
Partnership Deployment Form
Enemies
Un-Tax Pay
Exclude
Maddowed
Who Knows?
Who To Kill
Baby Balm
Cremate
Repeal It!
Angelsex
World Law
Jareded
Blame Gab
"Awesome"?
Sexsuits
Mopheads
DOS, not MAC/Apple
XXXtra Wife?
Weddings for Concubines?
Exxxtra Gal?
Endtime Prophecy
Cloture
Clothes?!
Presumers
CathBack
CommuNuts
Maytrixt
Aashoels?
Hacking
Earth Age
"Date" Line
Lezayfair
"The" "Word" of God?
For or Not For
Sex To See
Addicts

Why Blame?
"Whatever!" (?)
Blame Demoncrats
SotoKaga = Bad Picks, Wrong Choices
Perspectives
Benders, and Apps for All
Sourcery
Quaranteen
Only Once
Esau vs Jacob - NOT Jacob vs Esau
Adam to God
Clobbertexts
WHO is "Clergy?"
Vote for Who?
Hate FOR God
Sexxx Need 1
Look Away From Them
Stay Away
God To Adam
Almost
Womohimp
Your Call
The Koran
Pubersex?
Says Who?
Porn in Sandals
Oil Spill
Self-Saved?
Heretics!
To Be a Christian?
Bad Creeds
Why Confess?
Fisherotica
Newscults
Some for Sex
WHO is a "Jew?"
The WMD
The Elite
Apocrypha?
Literalics
"Bible" Apps 1
"Bible" Apps 2
Hit Brats
Polylove
Trust God?
Mommygod?
Intelligent Design?
Intelligent Design?
Girl King?
Anti-Homogays
TFK Eulogy
Unforgive
Say NO! to Sotomayor?
DevilTalk
NOT "How?"
Inclesia
501c3 Endangerment
Rephrase It?
Fenemies
Ungaysay
Anti-Homogays
It Exists
Blame Her
Poarn4Awl
Porn2go
WHY Vote for Women?
Iran for WHO?
LookLust
Defining "Christians"
BamaHelp
Speech
Tolerance?
"Best" Text?
SGNN
WILL It Be?
LET It Be
JewXians
DurbDirt
WHO Says?
Believe It
SpamSexx
Gods for War
Blood Debt
Lacking
Lent Money
Who Pays?
Wherareu?
Jewversion
No "Right"
Revenge
SuperBush
BailPlan
Pacify?
FairFight Debate
Help for the U.S.A.
BailBuzz
Yet Again
Die to Live?
Pack Guns
Dept of Jobs
Godowned
PornWait
Get & Use Windows 98SE
Abort Not
Foretelling the Future?
Gaza War (2008-2009)
Begotten?
Sloptalk
Sinisin
Realty and Marriage Policy Revision
Reincarnation?
Superman
Burn Pets
Oh Sure
Pacifism?
Licensed?
How Often?
PlayPal
Sex Waste
Harem - not Share'em
Forgiveness or Vengeance?
NO Woman VP!
New Owner
No Proposition 8?
No Obituaries
Heal Them All?
Euchabod
Ecumenica
First Amendment
NO Condoms
Trinitology
Neoliturgy
Cohabitation?
WHO is Lying?
Complainers
Choice for What?


Read God's Word and you will see
His doctrines which will set you free!
Avoid the lies of man-made rules
Ignore the hype of twisted fools.

Holy Scripture helps your soul
The Spirit's witness does extol
TRUE-textual versions of the whole.

The R.S.V. is good to read
Old Testament within is nice indeed.
Beware its clipped New Testament,
E'en worse the N.I.V. is bent
In anti-marriage Devil's creed.

The K.J.V. still seems the best
And far ahead of all the rest,
In rhyme and honest accur'cy
Though with archaic pundancy.

Along with those we think sublime
The NAS will do just fine.
And yet we need consistency
Diverse confusion must not be.

This author had previously read about a discrepancy involving two supposedly different Old-Testament Hebrew texts of the Bible:

1. The ben Asher
2. The ben Chayyim

I thus typed in both of them (one at a time) into major internet search engines to investigate.

One KJV-only diehard wrote on the subject, failing to declare that there was once a need for the creation of the at-that-time new King James Version itself, and that "the KJV" has undergone many revision and edition changes. He spoke of "THE Masoretic Text" without defining if THAT meant the ben Chayyim or the ben Asher text (purportedly discrepant against each other). He condemned Rudolf Kittel and his editor Kahle for putting footnotes in the text of their Stuttgart-edition Hebrew Bible based on a Leningrad Manuscript - with the presumption that Kittel wanted to confuse readers by insinuating that they randomly replace the main text with footnote alterations or substitutions. He went on to state that the American Bible Society offers an 1866-incepted Letteris (ben Chayyim) Hebrew Old-Testament text for sale, but this author has never seen any such advertisement from ABS at any time ever. Mr. KJV-only also failed to state WHY the ben Asher Hebrew Text was THE (recognized) Received Text in authority until the 1500s, but somehow lost that authenticity until Kittel's 1937 edition of ben Asher's Text - which Text the RSV and NASV are thankfully based upon. Seventh, KJV-only gave credence to a certain "Daniel Bomberg" (whoever HE was) and who (according to the preface of the NKJV Bible) concocted and printed a so-called "first rabbinic bible" in 1516 (whatever THAT was)......followed by [oh oh!]: a SECOND edition (the FIRST was NOT GOOD ENOUGH)? One internet source stated that Jacob ben Chayyim was apparently "some jewish refugee" who the source alleged to have become a Christian (sounds suspicious)! So WHO WAS ben Chayyim, and what were his motives for trashing the traditional ben Asher Text?

With all this in mind, I synthesized two internet pieces from one Jewish author giving further info about ben Asher:

Aaron ben Moses ben Asher lived in Tiberius during the first half of the 10th century. His family had been involved in creating and maintaining the MASORAH for either five or six generations. Ben Asher rapidly gained fame as the most authoritative of the Tiberian masoretes, and even after his death, his name continued to hold respect. His vocalization of the Bible is still - for all intents and purposes - THE Text Jews continue to use.

Moreover, Aaron ben Moses ben Asher was the first to take Hebrew grammar seriously. His SEFER DIKDUKEI HA-TE'AMIM (Grammar of the Vocalizations) was an original collection of grammatical rules and masoretic information. Grammatical principles were not at that time considered worthy of independent study.

Ben Asher had a tremendous influence on the world of Biblical grammar and scholarship. From documents found in the CAIRO GENIZA , it appears that this most famous masorete (and possibly his family for generations) were also - incidently - KARAITES.

As early as the eighth century, Talmudic rabbis encountered a major challenge. A group of Jews led by Anan ben David declared that they did not accept the authority of the rabbis to interpret Torah. This group, originally called the Ananites, developed their own understanding of Jewish law based only on the written Torah. The Ananites were stricter and more rigid than the rabbis in their understanding of Torah law. They simply did not accept the rabbis as legitimate authorities of Jewish law. They denied the authority of the Mishnah and the Gemarra .

It is difficult to determine Ananite doctrines because the Ananites relied on the Torah Text. Anan's famous adage was: "Search thoroughly the Torah and don't rely on my opinions."

In the ninth century, the major group of Ananites combined with other anti-rabbinic groups and became known as the Karaites (followers of the Kra, or Torah Text) in their Masoretic tradition of including VOWELS in the Torah Text. They believed that the Torah had originally been written with vowels, and they viewed such Text as the ONLY legitimate one.

It should not be surprising to discover that many masoretes, so involved in the Masorah, held Karaite beliefs. After all, it was the Karaites who placed such absolute reliance on the Torah Text. It would be natural that they would devote their lives to studying every aspect of it. The surprising element was that being a Karaite did not disqualify Aaron ben Moses ben Asher in the eyes of Rabbinic Jews.

Did the English-Worded KJV Always Exist on Earth?

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and God was the Word. That One was in the beginning with God, all things were made through Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made (John 1:1-3).

....the Word of the Lord remains forever (I Peter 1:25).

If the Ten Commandments etched in stone did not exist before God carved them out for Moses on the mountain, certainly the KJV did not exist before then either. After Noah and his kin descended down off the ark on a world devoid of any lifeforms and whatever hieroglyphics previously around (if any, whether Phoenician, Egyptian, Chinese, whatever), God laid down the Hebrew ALPHABET for Moses and the nations on Mount Sinai (amidst all the then-existing Babel languages and their written symbols occurring after The Flood).

The spoken (or oral) Bible started out rather simply with God verbally, audibly or however (without printed mass media) telling humanity to reproduce and eat green stuff (Genesis chapter 1), and telling Adam in particular to not eat of "the forbidden tree." Apparently, that divine tidbit of as-yet-nonwritten Scripture was conveyed (by whoever) to the inferior gender, who soon became the first nude preacheress on record to discourse with a snake. Her sermonette to Satan had a few omissions and additions pertaining to the intended Original Text (e.g. the word "freely" was left out, along with "midst of the garden," and a brand-new addition of hers "neither shall you touch it" was added. Thus, that first weaker-sex woman (ancestral grandmother of us all) competed against the Devil on her own, without Adam, in power-hungry feminist-"equality" arrogance and female naiivity (precursor of maryolatrous catholics who presume a female and God alone can create kiddies without any guy around).....and so corrupted the earliest and simplest Scripture. Her usually-clothed-thereafter progenie have continued to screw things up ever since, as more and more sacred sayings were mangled by myriads mouthing mindless blatterings masquerading as gospel truth.

Again, the LORD Himself intervened to (thankfully) a male human, again. On the two tablets of stone in rock, He Himself (wrote down The Text, instructing Rabbi Moses in details enabling him to compose the Pentateuch (Torah) Old Testament according to creationist info supernaturally supplied.

God also talked to others verbally, like from between two cherubim above the mercy seat of the ark of the covenant after talking out of a burning bush which didn't really burn (i.e. DID burn but was constantly rejuvenated for more to burn - sort of like the future bodies of those who will forever continue to burn to the ages of the ages in the hellish Lake of Fire). He also spoke audibly out of a cloud, using the mouth of Jesus, out of a blinding light on some road to Damascus, and to a Peter, Paul, and John (original 12 apostles) and others in dreams and visions. Outside of what is recorded in the Bible, any dreams or visions having occurred or allegedly occurred, occurring or allegedly occurring, to occur or allegedly occur, can be questioned as to authenticity of whether or not being GOD'S actual revelation on a more or less take it or leave it basis.

Which brings us to what is TRULY canonical bona-fide Bible, and what is FAKE [pseudo]-"biblical" utterances. Jesus Himself read from a copy of the book of Isaiah handed to Him in a temple. Whatever Old-Testament books and writings He and his New-Testament gospel and epistle authors referred to can obviously be considered canonical.

Such historically happened, causing eyewitnesses to relate perfectly to next-generation faithful and honest copyists who non-carelessly read, recorded, and related ALL PERTINENT words written in common public alpha-to-omega Greek letters EVERYONE in their right mind could understand -- inerrant to the last iota jot and tittle. Dedicated printing of such on papyrus was inspired and infallible.

The Divine Copyright Enforcer had, has, and will have His ways to insure that Word is clearly and obviously canonical......

First, He is the Jealous Executioner. To name a few examples of the disfavored in the Old Testament who bit the dust: the assaultive perverts of Sodom and Gomorrah, Er and Onan (Judah's son's of Genesis 38), pollutive harassing belligerent canaanites who Joshua and the Jews exterminated under orders from God, Haman the diabolical antisemite (Book of Esther), 100 state-trooper sheriff-deputy-type soldiers ganging up on Elijah (II Kings 1), 186,000 Assyrian commandos (Isaiah 37:36), Hananiah the false prophet (Jeremiah 28), lying Ananias and Sapphira (Acts 5), child-murderer saint-beheader Roman governor Herod (Acts 12), at least sixteen 9112001 megavandal genocidal Saudi-terrorist kamikazes who admirably murdered themselves with suicide, etc.

Second, the LORD preserved (and preserves!) the lives of his elect, providentially provides for and fills them with boundless phenomenal faith, joy, and confidence. Remember The Bomb which annihilated Shinto Jap terrorists who had brutally demolished Pearl Harbor. Remember ethereally-uplifting Billy-Graham-crusade-choir singing.

Getting back to the Dark Ages, saints within and outside the Catholic Church faithfully copied The ONE Text which they had received from previous saints and preserved by a Power not of this Earth.

Autograph-accurateText in papyrus, headquartered in Antioch, was diversely scattered and read, becoming more ancient and worn as time went on, but CAREFULLY-copied duplicates were PAINSTAKINGLY produced, and such already-canonical Text was disseminiated in greater and greater numbers worldwide.

Inevitably, counterfeits (like weeds) began to appear from heretics such as Marcion and others who concocted corrupt Alexandrian and Sinaiticus type Greek-lettered replacements - blasphemously miscalled " manuscripts"- ultimately synthesized by the occultic-spiritualist demonic duo Hort and Westcott in England in the late 1800s, peddled and promoted thereafter by Metzger, Aland, and Nestle.

The ORIGINAL Text survived in entirety, however, true to God's promise and power of indestructibility and eternal longevity. Erasmus (respected by Martin Luther) tried to sort out the genuine from the garbage, and at that time did his best with consecutive improving editions. Beza and Stephanus continued the refinement, and Scrivener of England finally put it all together in 1894 into what is now know as the Scrivener Trinitarian Greek Text of the New Testament for these momentous last days before Christ's visible bodily return to Earth at Armageddon.

Should Isaiah 7:14 Be Translated maiden or instead virgin?

The Revised Standard Version (RSV) has, for its Isaiah 7:14, the following phrase: "a young woman shall conceive and bear a son" whereas the King James Version (KJV) has the phrase: "the virgin shall conceive..." instead of young woman for the exact same passage.

Well, which is it: "young woman" or "virgin?"

All young-women virgins are young women, but obviously not all young women are young-women virgins.

Allow no one to "get away with" being an accursed fool and blatter that: "it doesn't matter" or: "whatever" pertaining to precise word choice. It certainly does matter!

The Isaiah 7:14 passage in practically all translations (except the RSV, for example) state that a virgin "shall conceive" whereas most all translations of Matthew 1:23 state that a virgin "shall be with child" instead of the phrase: "shall conceive." There is a notable difference between the two different phrases.

All virgins can eventually conceive as stated in Isaiah 7:14, but it is extraordinary for a virgin to already be "with child" as stated in Matthew 1:23.

Neither the word "virgin" in Isaiah 7:14 [who "conceives" instead of "being with child"] cannot legitimately be replaced with the substitute words: damsel, maid, maiden, nor girl - being that some of such human females could be pre-puberty underaged and thus incapable or either conceiving or already being with child.

The "conceiving" or "already being with child" of necessity specifies female gender and thus excludes the possibility of reference to male virgins.

Also, the word maid is inadequate as a substitute word for Isaiah 7:14 because such term involves the additional connotation of servitude as a slave or employee.

Invariably most commentators have related that Matthew 1:23 "virgin" passage to the Old-Testament reference of Isaiah 7:14.

Specifically, Isaiah 7:14 does not contain Strong's English-lettered Hebrew-text Word# 1330 for "virgin", but instead contains Strong's Word# 5959 for: [an-obviously-female] young woman.

Again, for Strong's Word# 5959 used in Isaiah 7:14 the RSV has it properly translated: "young woman" but which the KJV got incorrect using the term: "virgin".

Concerned theologians (including yours truly) wonder that being Isaiah 7:14 only refers to a "young woman" conceiving" how can that particular passage be the prophesied source of the prediction in Matthew 1:23 referring instead to a virgin: "[already being] with child"?

Some say it is "irrelevant:"
The Virgin Birth a "true event"?
Presuming resurrection might have been
A hoax occurring way back when.

The miracles that Jesus did
Were myths of those who flipped their lid?
And all that did had THIS result:
Imposing one more WACKO cult?

Though skeptics have been proven wrong
The righteous saints still sing God's song,
Satanic doubters scoff The Way
Till Christ returns on Judgment Day!

Confrontation:

HomePage
Ponytail
Evolute
Clothed
Invest
ElecCars
BushOPEC

Unity and Pistols for Democrats and Republicans

Feel free to e-mail compliments or criticisms to:
vladimir.icorikov@yandex.com